by

April 4, 2012

Do you like this?

GC Open Letter Signatories

Photo Courtesy of Jeremy Smith

Locations of the churches whose pastors signed an open letter in support of the Connectional Table/Interim Operations Team's radical restructure of The United Methodist Church.

In Virginia Bassford’s book (which is recommended reading for General Conference) she states:

Hegemony…is the perspective of the dominant culture, race, or group, as if it were the only perspective–everyone else needs to get on board. Hegemony is blind to the notion that we–you and I, perhaps most especially when we are divergent–are in this together. We each have distinctive points of view. Together, we can have a wide-angle outlook [that we need].

V. Bassford Lord, I love the Church and We Need Help, page 35.

One of the newest developments in the Call To Action conversation is that the pastors of the largest churches sent an open letter to General Conference delegates. It’s nice. It talks about the death tsunami and the coming doom and gloom of the UMC, the inefficiency of the General Boards, and the graying of the clergy. It asserts a need for organizational change so that the church can be focused on nurturing vital congregations. All boilerplate CTA stuff but worded in a way that even my skeptical young clergy friends are signing it.

But as I was reading Bassford’s book, that quote jumped out at me as I read the original signatories to this open letter, purportedly the pastors of the largest churches in the UMC. “Hegemony”  means a dominant group that thinks alike. Now, each of these churches has grown and they meet regularly to learn from each other how to continue growing, so they clearly think of their churches in similar ways (at least on a spectrum, they would be together). And that’s fine, we want our churches to grow and it is great to learn from leaders that have grown their churches effectively. I don’t mind this hegemony group.

But as I read the signatories, I began to wonder if there was a regional hegemony as well in the Call To Action.

When we map the 87 clergy originators of this petition on Google Maps), we get a disturbing trend as far as how many signatories are from one area of the country. (here’s a map of the jurisdictional breakdown [or PDF here]):

  • Northeast Jurisdiction signatories: 3
  • Western Jurisdiction signatories: 2
  • North Central signatories: 10
  • South Central and South Eastern signatories combined: 72

So the Southern jurisdictions have nearly 5x the number of crafters to the letter than the other regions combined. That immediately put up a red flag for me. It becomes very difficult to not be disturbed when the recommendations coming from these churches represent the population density but not the vast diversity of the United Methodist Church.

by

April 4, 2012

Comments (1)

Comment Feed

The Southern Hegemony

Having served in Wisconsin, and having associates in many parts of the country, I have seen for many years that the southern jurisdictions were more interested in politics and the other three jurisdictions were more oriented around program. Just look at the difference in organizational complexities and property holdings of the jurisdictions.

The temptation for those analyzing the potential split in the UMC is to look at the theological issues that divide us. But I agree with Rev. Smith. The real dynamics are over power and not theology. Despite the talk of separation, the hegemony cannot afford to have the denomination split because then they would lose resources and properties they want to control. Their best bet to become more powerful is to politicize the burgeoning African conferences.

What the hegemony does not realize is the sophistication of understanding power in some African conferences which may very well supercede that of the southern jurisdictions. It is no small matter that the Episcopaleons have a segment of their conservative congregations recognizing an African as their bishop.

Just think..., what if Call to Action passes and the bishops get their cherished "set aside" bishop, and that bishop is from Africa?

One further question: Can someone follow the money trail that provides the resources for these efforts?

Thanks to Rev. Smith for emphasizing the power issues with his article. That advances this line of analysis.

Jerry Eckert more than 1 years ago

Your generous gifts to United Methodist Insight bring you the best of discernments from longtime church experts and rising leaders. Click on the donate button above or make checks payable to St. Stephen UMC and write "UM Insight" on the memo line. Then post to United Methodist Insight, c/o St. Stephen United Methodist Church, 2520 Oates Drive, Mesquite, TX 75150.
Thanks to our most recent contributors:

David Eichelberger

Continued thanks to our major supporters:
The Joe and Louise Cook Foundation, Temple, TX
Bishop Yap Kim Hao, Methodist Church of Singapore
Anne C. Ewing, First UMC of Germantown, PA
Phil and Joann Susag, Manchester, CT

Sign up for the weekly compilation of UM Insight original content and articles from multiple sources of interest to the future of The United Methodist Church.
  • United Methodist Insight List
Built with Metro Publisher™