by

May 9, 2012

Do you like this?

by

May 9, 2012

Comments (1)

Comment Feed

Restructuring?

I was at Gen Conf 2012 as an observer to the General Administration Committee and I read all of their assigned legislation and watched them through long, long days of hard work.

The first restructuring attempt, the Call to Action (CtA) proposal was immensely restrictive, having a church of 12 million very diverse people run by a Board of 15 individuals, almost all from the U.S. It attempted to reduce the boards and agencies to committees of that board, and it had almost no representation from the Central Conferences, which is where the church is growing. Out of this, mostly by CtA people who were unhappy came something called Plan B, somewhat more flexible and inclusive but not much. The Methodist Federation for Social Action also created a plan, much more inclusive, with a larger governing board and significant participation from the Central Conferences.

The Committee labored hard, but could not find any combination that had enough support to pass. This was largely because the committee was packed by a very large number of delegates from the Connectional Table, who had produced the CtA plan and were, finally, unwilling to be flexible enough to work with others.

So, the committee could find no full scale or even skeletal restructuring proposal to bring to the plenary floor.

Meanwhile, many of the Boards and Agencies, seeing the handwriting on the wall had spent a couple of years considering their own structures, reducing Boards for more efficiency, and generally doing what boards ought to do every decade; that legislation was seen but not acted on, except for a very impressive set of new governance resolutions from United Methodist Women which passed without amendment or negative vote, which meant they went onto the consent calendar and were passed by the Whole GC2012 without further debate.

When the CtA and PlanB people saw the situation, they worked up overnight something they called PlanUMC, and somehow, despite it not being even seen by any committee or sub committee, got all 76 pages of it into the
Daily Christian Advocate for the Plenary session. That hasty plan, an attempt to save the restrictive structures of CtA and Plan B, is what the Judicial Council declared hopelessly unconstitutional.

However, don’t forget all those Agency revisions. They were presented and passed as a group, allowing the various church parts to work on and revise their agencies in ways they know best and return a much revivified church to General Council 2016 with a much larger participation by the Central Conferences.

This is not to say that some terrible things did not happen at GC2012, particularly in matters of the open and inclusive church and in the unbelievable vote taken on whether God’s Grace is available to all at all times, which apparently only 56% of the GC2012 believes to be true.

However, the restructure issue was not an unmitigated disaster, and in fact came out a lot better than perhaps we deserved. I have never been so close

Anne Ewing more than 2 years ago

Blog Categories

  • When they called it a "Modest Proposal" I thought they were citing Jonathan Swift's satiric "modest...

    Mitchell Hay | Some Suggestions for a Unified UMC (or the A&W Plan)

  • People keep talking about "finding out what we have in common". Well, put your money where you mout...

    Betsy | Antagonisn't

  • A view from the pew: What intrigues me about this brouhaha is absolutely nobody stops and look at t...

    Betsy | Antagonisn't

FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION

United Methodist Insight helps leaders prepare for 21st century challenges of faith. Click on the donate button above for online giving. Or make checks payable to St. Stephen UMC and write "UM Insight" on the memo line. Then mail to United Methodist Insight, c/o St. Stephen United Methodist Church, 2520 Oates Drive, Mesquite, TX 75150. Thank you!