June 29, 2012

Do you like this?

Peter and Paul

Photo courtesy of Wiki Paintings

El Greco's painting of the Apostles Peter and Paul

Did Paul obey his General Conference?

If Peter was the first Pope, then Paul was the first Protestant. In the original church as today, there are two basic conceptions of Christian authority: apostolic succession and the priesthood of the believer. Paul represented the latter; he gave himself a lot of discretion as a pastor in the different congregational contexts in which he ministered. He didn’t mail a single Book of Discipline to Corinth, Ephesus, Colossus, Phillipi, Thessalonica, Galatia, and Rome. Each epistle that would make its way into our Biblical canon was practical and contextual though there are theological threads which develop and solidify over the course of Paul’s writing. In Acts 15, in what Methodists like me might call the first General Conference of the church, a council of apostles and elders convened to consider the debate between Judaizers who were teaching that the Law of Moses was necessary to salvation and Paul who was teaching salvation by faith. The compromise adopted by the council was to require Gentiles to avoid sacrificial meats, blood, meat of strangled animals, and pagan sexuality (Acts 15:20). In response to this decision, Paul doesn’t simply obey; he comes up with his own creative, contextual interpretation for at least two of the four items on this list.

Listen to how Paul deals with the issue of sacrificial meats in 1 Corinthians 10:23-33:

Eat whatever is sold in the meat market without raising any question on the ground of conscience, for ‘the earth and its fullness are the Lord’s.’ If an unbeliever invites you to a meal and you are disposed to go, eat whatever is set before you without raising any question on the ground of conscience. But if someone says to you, ‘This has been offered in sacrifice’, then do not eat it, out of consideration for the one who informed you, and for the sake of conscience— I mean the other’s conscience, not your own. For why should my liberty be subject to the judgement of someone else’s conscience? If I partake with thankfulness, why should I be denounced because of that for which I give thanks? So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do everything for the glory of God. Give no offence to Jews or to Greeks or to the church of God, just as I try to please everyone in everything I do, not seeking my own advantage, but that of many, so that they may be saved.

Paul makes it very clear that any meat (sacrificial or strangled) can be eaten “without raising any question on the ground of conscience, quoting Psalm 24:1 as his justification. He doesn’t belittle or denigrate the council in Jerusalem, but he doesn’t obey their decision. Instead, he nuances it for pastoral and evangelistic reasons. In some contexts, you eat sacrificial meat; in other contexts, you don’t. It all relates to the purpose of “pleasing everyone in everything I do… so that they may be saved.” If someone at the table eating with you thinks it’s a sin to eat the sacrificial meat, then it is a sin for you to eat it in front of them because of the scandal it causes them. Paul elaborates further in Romans 14:13-19:

June 29, 2012

Comments (3)

Comment Feed

GC

If an unbeliever invites you to a meal and you are disposed to go, eat whatever is set before you without raising any question on the ground of conscience. But if someone says to you, ‘This has been offered in sacrifice’, then do not eat it.
This statement does not contradict the council.

Paul goes to Jerusalem to explain what he has been teaching and to get the approval of the council. It was important to Paul the Church was unified in what was being taught in the church. Why else go?

Paul says“.. that question came up only because of some so-called Christians there—false ones, really—who were secretly brought in. They sneaked in to spy on us and take away the freedom we have in Christ Jesus. They wanted to enslave us and force us to follow their Jewish regulations. 5 But we refused to give in to them for a single moment. We wanted to preserve the truth of the gospel message for you.
6 And the leaders of the church had nothing to add to what I was preaching.
The Council agreed with Paul and found the allegations false.

“While I was there I met privately with those considered to be leaders of the church and shared with them the message I had been preaching to the Gentiles. I wanted to make sure that we were in agreement, for fear that all my efforts had been wasted and I was running the race for nothing.
This statement makes it abundantly clear Paul is looking for approval from the council.
“For fear” implies Paul was not as sure as some would have us believe. “For fear” also let’s us know what the Council of Jerusalem decided would be final and important to Paul.

3 And they supported me and did not even demand that my companion Titus be circumcised, though he was a Gentile.”

The Council would agree with Paul.
This is the second account that gives more detail.
The first account in Acts simply states the law.
The second account explains practical application.
The allegations were false. Made by non Christians referred to as “false ones”.

Paul himself would later make decision to ex communicate members of the church who practiced and taught false doctrine. The difference was Paul, a true believer, made his judgment and penalties on true testimony.

The accusations against Paul were a sham.
No it is not sad. It is how things are suppose to work.



d 323 days ago

Did Paul Disobey his General Conference?

Absolutely, as this article noted. What the author did NOT note, though, is if you read Paul's letter to the Galatians, it is obvious that he was brought to the Council of Jerusalem literally on Charges, and he was brought there for the equivalent of what we today, in the UMC, call a "church trial." He paid a heavy price, including have to take up an offering in each place where he started a congregation, to send back to the "saints in Jerusalem" with whom he profoundly disagreed.

It always seems that every time a pastor takes a stand to do ministry within his/her church's cultural context, and that goes against General Conference dictates, the law gets more and more restrictive, not for the sake of the ministry of Jesus Christ but to try to uphold and impose the will of the majority.

Sad, isn't it.

Tom Griffith 326 days ago

Paul

The Jerusalem council sent Paul and Barnabas and two other men to Antioch (15:22.They would testify to the truth of the decree (15:27). These men strengthened the Antioch church (15:32) and helped to solidify unity in the Christian Community and Christian Church.

The decree instructed the gentile Christians to abstain from four things and all where preached, upheld and enforced by the Apostles.

Pollutions of idols (15:20) or things sacrificed to idols (15:29; 21:25).

Blood. This is a prohibition of eating or drinking blood.

Strangled things because strangulation played a role in some pagan cults.

Sexual immorality

Yes Paul did obey. He preached the Jerusalem Decree.

d 327 days ago

Your generous gifts to United Methodist Insight bring you the best of discernments from longtime church experts and rising leaders. Click on the donate button above or make checks payable to St. Stephen UMC and write "UM Insight" on the memo line. Then post to United Methodist Insight, c/o St. Stephen United Methodist Church, 2520 Oates Drive, Mesquite, TX 75150.
Thanks to our most recent contributors:
Bridget Young-Ross
Ann Freeman
Continued thanks to our major supporters:
The Joe and Louise Cook Foundation, Temple, TX
Bishop Yap Kim Hao, Methodist Church of Singapore
Anne C. Ewing, First UMC of Germantown, PA
Phil and Joann Susag, Manchester, CT

Sign up for the weekly compilation of UM Insight original content and articles from multiple sources of interest to the future of The United Methodist Church.
  • United Methodist Insight List
Built with Metro Publisher™