by

June 2, 2012

Do you like this?

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way..."           -- Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities

This could describe the 2012 General Conference of The United Methodist Church.  There's been a lot of anxiety over what we accomplished but maybe more anxiety over what we didn't.

The Call to Action received some major support by some heavy hitters in United Methodism.  A lot of bishops put their stamp of approval on it.  Rev. Adam Hamilton spoke out for it before and during General Conference.  He even showed a video interviewing a woman who was closing her church.  The implication was that this is where all our churches are heading if we don't get it together.

It was stated by Rev. Hamilton as well as many others that what we do with the structure of the General Agencies really won't make or break the denomination. The future lies at the local church level.  These moments of clarity didn't subdue our anxiety though.

I'm wondering if the fact that the majority of our leadership is coming from the Baby Boomer generation makes a difference in the level of anxiety.  They've always had the biggest numbers and they may be concerned about their legacy.  But schools have closed due to changing population dynamics and churches are now experiencing some of the same.

The Call to Action failed to secure enough ground support to pass.  And yet there was a great pressure to change due to the impending population shift within our denomination.  Basically, we have aged as a people.  The majority of our churches are old.  Everyone's looking ahead ten or twenty years and all we can see is tumbleweeds blowing around our sanctuaries.

Plans to change our structure abounded. The Methodist Federation for Social Action was the first group to fire a shot across the bow with their own plan. Then a collection of lay and clergy largely from the Southeastern Jurisdiction put forward Plan B.

None of these passed through the General Administration committee. Those serving on other committees seemed to be shocked that no new plan passed and would be presented with majority support. Derogatory comments were made about the committee members as if they were less holy or intelligent than the rest of us for not being able to get something -- anything -- passed.

by

June 2, 2012

Comments (1)

Comment Feed

What GC DID do

It was clear that the extremely radical proposals of the Connectional Table did not sit well with the GC, including a number of its own members. While the Church needs something, that was not it.
However, the Agencies' individual revisions of their programs, budgets and boards was a good thing. It is just what a good organization should do every decade or so the bring themselves up to date, prime out old stuff and get set for a new decade.
Now we have a quadrennium to see how those agencies function, to allow them to correct any errors in their plans, and in 2016 present the GC with a functioning body of Agencies.
I think that was the best possible outcome, and we will be MUCH better prepared to consider overall structures in 4 years.
Somehow the CT will have to be prevented from spending another couple of million dollars on consultants who tell is what we already know, and/or treat us like businesses whose bottom line is numbers, and profitability and instead, we all need to consider what churches ARE, what God intended them to be, and where we SHOULD be.

Anne Ewing 353 days ago

Recent Posts

Your generous gifts to United Methodist Insight bring you the best of discernments from longtime church experts and rising leaders. Click on the donate button above or make checks payable to St. Stephen UMC and write "UM Insight" on the memo line. Then post to United Methodist Insight, c/o St. Stephen United Methodist Church, 2520 Oates Drive, Mesquite, TX 75150.
Thanks to our most recent contributors:

David Eichelberger

Continued thanks to our major supporters:
The Joe and Louise Cook Foundation, Temple, TX
Bishop Yap Kim Hao, Methodist Church of Singapore
Anne C. Ewing, First UMC of Germantown, PA
Phil and Joann Susag, Manchester, CT

Sign up for the weekly compilation of UM Insight original content and articles from multiple sources of interest to the future of The United Methodist Church.
  • United Methodist Insight List
Built with Metro Publisher™