by

June 2, 2012

Do you like this?

The set-aside bishop did not pass (more distrust of our bishops) but guaranteed appointments were done away with (distrust of the competency of our clergy as well as our laity - where do we think clergy come from in the first place?).  

A hybrid Plan UMC was thrown together and brought to the floor of General Conference (we suspended the rules to do so). It passed with a strange feeling among the delegation. No one was really happy with the plan and yet the anxiety generated leading up to the General Conference left many feeling that we needed to do something (even if we weren't really sure what we were passing).

Then the Judicial Council ruled Plan UMC unconstitutional and we had to scramble.  We passed the original General Agency proposals to restructure their own bodies.  Not as sweeping but it did cut the budget to what our projected income would bear over the next four years.

The feeling leaving General Conference was unusual. For the first time, legislation was left on the table without seeing debate on the floor. The current structure stayed basically intact.  We didn't add any over-site to the General Agencies which didn't help the mistrust of them (which may be a carry-over of the distrust of big government by the US delegates). 

There's been a lot of blog posts lamenting our lack of movement. There's been a lot of weeping and gnashing of teeth. I'm not sure why anyone who's studied systems theory was surprised. This was a demonstration of the main tenet:

      Systems resist change.

We saw the same thing in 2008 when the Worldwide Nature of the Church proposals passed General Conference (barely) and then failed to secure the two-thirds support needed by the annual conferences.  

We see that change is needed by the population dynamics but we are unable to agree on what that change should look like. And yet change will come.  

It will likely come at the ground level. Churches will learn to successfully share the gospel with a changing society and they will grow or they won't and they will close. Unfortunately, there will be more closings than growth. But we will survive.

And this will facilitate change.  

We may have forgotten that God is a part of this process. We believe that God precedes us wherever we go. That includes what we do as a denomination.

I shared a devotion with our Annual Conference Council leading up to General Conference.  It was about when Elijah thought he was the only faithful one.  Then God informed him that there were 7,000 faithful subjects left (which indicates the perfect number left to accomplish God's designs).  Elijah remembered that something larger than himself was a part of the change.

He learned to trust in God and not worry.

A Tale of Two Cities ends with revolution but it also ends with sacrifice for the greater good.  If we can learn to trust in what Christ has taught us about this, we will be fine.

The church will look different but that is to be expected.  

We're better off leading out of confidence rather than anxiety.

It is a confidence that God is out in front which really is the best of times.

by

June 2, 2012

Comments (1)

Comment Feed

What GC DID do

It was clear that the extremely radical proposals of the Connectional Table did not sit well with the GC, including a number of its own members. While the Church needs something, that was not it.
However, the Agencies' individual revisions of their programs, budgets and boards was a good thing. It is just what a good organization should do every decade or so the bring themselves up to date, prime out old stuff and get set for a new decade.
Now we have a quadrennium to see how those agencies function, to allow them to correct any errors in their plans, and in 2016 present the GC with a functioning body of Agencies.
I think that was the best possible outcome, and we will be MUCH better prepared to consider overall structures in 4 years.
Somehow the CT will have to be prevented from spending another couple of million dollars on consultants who tell is what we already know, and/or treat us like businesses whose bottom line is numbers, and profitability and instead, we all need to consider what churches ARE, what God intended them to be, and where we SHOULD be.

Anne Ewing more than 1 years ago

Recent Posts

Your generous gifts to United Methodist Insight bring you the best of discernments from longtime church experts and rising leaders. Click on the donate button above or make checks payable to St. Stephen UMC and write "UM Insight" on the memo line. Then post to United Methodist Insight, c/o St. Stephen United Methodist Church, 2520 Oates Drive, Mesquite, TX 75150.
Thanks to our most recent contributors:

David Eichelberger

Continued thanks to our major supporters:
The Joe and Louise Cook Foundation, Temple, TX
Bishop Yap Kim Hao, Methodist Church of Singapore
Anne C. Ewing, First UMC of Germantown, PA
Phil and Joann Susag, Manchester, CT

Sign up for the weekly compilation of UM Insight original content and articles from multiple sources of interest to the future of The United Methodist Church.
  • United Methodist Insight List
Built with Metro Publisher™