May 2, 2012

Do you like this?

By a vote of 504 to 344, the 2012 General Conference has asked the Judicial Council to provide a declaratory decision on the constitutionality of Plan UMC. Click here to read more.

By a vote of 567 to 384, the 2012 United Methodist General Conference gave tentative approval to a slightly amended version of “Plan UMC” to reconfigure general agencies and downsize their boards.

It will be up to the lawmaking assembly to give final approval after the General Council on Finance and Administration, the denomination’s finance agency, reports on the plan’s financial implications. [Editor's Note: The plan also has been referred to the Judicial Council to tests its constitutionality].

The May 2 vote follows days of ups and downs when at one point, it looked like General Conference might conclude without proposing any restructuring proposal.

General Conference amended the proposal to increase the representation of United Methodists in the central conference regions of Africa, Europe and Asia to about 30 percent on the boards of the four program agencies as well as the new General Council for Strategy and Oversight, which replaces the Connectional Table.

The amendment from a Liberian delegate had the support of those who drafted the compromise plan.

Here are some highlights of the approved plan:

  • Annual conferences would have more flexibility to organize as they see fit to promote vitality.
  • A General Council for Strategy and Oversight with 34 voting members will oversee the work of the denomination’s four program agencies — the Boards of Discipleship, Global Ministries, Church and Society, and Higher Education and Ministry. Those agencies would still have their own boards but be accountable to the general council.
  • The general council would have its own executive general secretary, with a maximum term of 12 years. That executive will be able to convene and evaluate the general secretaries who oversee the program board.
  • It would also have authority to “withhold approval of any programs or activities that represent unnecessary duplication within an agency or between two or more agencies, or otherwise fail to meet established outcomes.”
  • The General Council for Finance and Administration would remain separate and collaborate on budget matters with the General Council for Strategy and Oversight.
  • The Board of Pension and Health Benefits, the United Methodist Publishing House, United Methodist Men and United Methodist Women would be separate agencies amenable to General Conference.
  • United Methodist Communications (which includes United Methodist News Service) would  be in the same position it is now — answering to General Conference, but its budget would be determined in consultation with the General Council on Finance and Administration and General Council for Strategy and Oversight.
  • The plan replaces the United Methodist Commission on Archives and History with a Committee on Archives and History. Its top executive would become an associate general secretary of the General Council on Finance and Administration.
  • The plan replaces the churchwide Commissions on Religion and Race and Commission on the Status and Role of Women with a United Methodist Committee of Inclusiveness that reports to the proposed General Council for Strategy and Oversight.


May 2, 2012

Comments (1)

Comment Feed

Methodist Structure proposal 2012

Is monitoring for Women and Etnic minorities eliminated? It appears the word Inclusiveness does still include these two groups.

Ella more than 1 years ago