Analysis of Bishops’ Option 2 for A Way Forward

by

by

Comments (4)

Comment Feed

And a dioccesan model of espiscopacy

Did not help the Episcopal Church navigate the sexuality question intact. In fact, to date, there is no mainline denomination that has successfully navigated the sexuality question intact and collectively they represent a broad range of how the church functions. The reality is, many of us that believe in classical Christianity will not be satisfied with being just an option on a menu of choices, anymore than progressives are.

Betsy more than 2 years ago

Disingenuous at Best

To paraphrase the late Richard John Neuhaus "Where orthodoxy is optional, orthodoxy will sooner or later be proscribed." And as further explained by Francis Beckwith, "Whenever a practitioner of a traditional vice appeals to the right of privacy as the justification for the state to leave him alone to engage in that vice, he will inevitably demand that the state require that those who morally disapprove of his practice cooperate with it, either materially or formally." Substitute UMC for "state" in this and you have what will become the de facto and de jure stand of the UMC>

Sooner, rather than later, those who claim freedom of conscience to disagree with this option, if adopted, will be subjected to uncompromising church discipline (no confidential just resolutions allowed for bigots!), and driven from the ministry of the UMC. Just look at The Episcopal Church for a view of the future for the UMC. At least in the ELCA, if a church leaves for another recognized Lutheran synod, it takes its property with it, which is probably why congregations by the hundreds have left ELCA.

Daniel more than 2 years ago

Okay, but...

"This sketch also specifically protects the rights of those whose conscience will not allow them to perform same gender weddings or ordain LGBTQ persons".
And those people will be called bigots, haters, and everything else by progressives. So what is the point?

Sarah more than 2 years ago

This comment is disingenuous

The writer is pretending to be Edgar Cayce or Jean Dixon, or maybe Nostradamus or Criswell. There is no evidence of what the future will be. I think bigots and haters will be called what they are regardless. The writer's attempt to link that reality to one of the options is absurd.

George Nixon Shuler more than 2 years ago

Notable Quotes 



“Vote for love. When we vote for love over fear, we can rest confidently that we voted our faith and put flesh on our prayers.”   – Shane Claiborne


Robert P. Jones, founder and CEO of Public Religion Research Institute. (PRRI Photo)“[The] inability or unwillingness, or both, to see systemic racism in the country is a particularly Christian problem among whites.”

– Robert P. Jones, author of "White Too Long: The Legacy of White Supremacy in American Christianity," quoted in the Louisville Courier-Journal.

We Appreciate Your Support

     As we face challenging times, United Methodist Insight welcomes your financial support to bring you news and views of The United Methodist Church in a world seeking a new future.

     TEXT your contribution to 84-321 with "(amt) Insight" via your smartphone or go to https://ststephenumctx.churchcenter.com/giving/to/um-insight Your additional contribution of the 2.2% processing fee will make your donation go farther.

     Make CHECKS payable to our sponsoring congregation, St. Stephen UMC, and write "UM Insight" on the memo line. Then mail to United Methodist Insight, c/o St. Stephen United Methodist Church, 2520 Oates Drive, Mesquite, TX 75150. Thank you!