Michigan WCA Letter
A photograph of the letter sent to United Methodist clergy in Michigan by the local chapter of the Wesleyan Covenant Association. In granting permission for United Methodist Insight to publish the photo, the Rev. Keith Lenard Jr. said he posted his photo on Facebook because he believed Rev. Vaughn William Thurston-Cox's critical post "to be misleading and obfuscating what the letter was about: An invitation for discussion."
An Open Letter to the Wesleyan Covenant Association Re: Your Invitation to Join to Your Conservative Movement
Today I received a letter from the president of your Michigan Area chapter. There are probably several reasons you invited me: I graduated from Asbury Seminary (twice). I have served several very conservative congregations. I had been ordained in the Free Methodist Church. I have many conservative friends and continue to hold some conservative positions of my own. All of this said, I cannot accept your invitation for reasons I will enumerate here:
1) You claim exclusive sanctity within our connection as those who hold a high view of Scripture. I grew up being told ignorant liberals didn’t believe in the Bible at all. They didn’t believe the Scriptures were inspired, didn’t preach them, and treated them like any other book in the world. This simply isn’t true. I have had the privilege of dialogue with progressive pastors who insist on the inspiration of Scripture and its diligent study. At the same time, I have met many conservatives who engage in almost no study at all. They simply spout what they have been told must be true. You cannot claim exclusive sanctity in relation to Scripture. You only do so to smear your opponents rather than engage them.
2) You claim exclusive right to the interpretation of Scripture. The WCA doesn’t allow conversation around gender and sexuality. The conclusion is already spelled out. You can present an alternative interpretation, but it isn’t legitimate unless it comes out to the same conclusion.
3) You claim to be under attack, when it has been conservative forces that have devastated the lives of laity and clergy across our connection. You believe passionately. I get that. The fact is, though, I have never heard a single progressive threaten a traditionalist for their heterosexuality or for refusing to marry a gay couple. At the same time, I have watched as otherwise fruitful religious leaders have been drive out of ministry for marrying a single-gender couple or being married to someone of the same sex.
4) Your compromise isn’t compromise at all. It is the strengthening of your own position across the connection and expulsion of all those who disagree. There is no real dialogue. There are only your efforts to get what you want, which leaves no room for dialogue or understanding.
5) My wife, an ordained elder serving in our conference, received no such invitation. I wonder why. Is it because of her gender? Or is it because she serves on the Board of Church and Society?
6) You claim to be the exclusive inheritors of the Wesleyan tradition. Again, simply not true. I don’t know that I have met a single person or seen any organization embrace the Wesley brothers fully. They embraced the evangelical tradition AND the social justice tradition. They worshipped with sacrament and charisma. Most churches in the Wesleyan tradition tend to emphasize one, or maybe two, of these. Some embrace Evangelicalism and call that Welsey. Others embrace social justice and call that Wesley. Free Methodists, Nazarenes, and Wesleyans once celebrated the holiness aspect of Wesley. Said briefly, you are not the purist Wesleyan movement out there.
My invitation would be to dialogue. While I hold little hope our connection will hold in 2019, it might if we stop arguing positions and practice God’s command: love one another.
This post is republished with the author's permission from Facebook.